Species Richness & Evenness (S, Margalef, Menhinick, J = H′/H′max)
Richness S with Margalef/Menhinick indices, Shannon H′, Pielou evenness J, and Berger–Parker dominance from a named or plain species list.
Execution
Run this tool
Fill in the form, run the tool, and review the result in one place.
Samples
Examples that match this tool
Related
Continue with connected tools and hubs
Result
Ready for a run
Run the tool to preview files, text, structured data, or streamed output here.
Tool usage guide
Learn when to use this tool, what it supports, and how real users apply it.
Key facts
Category
Health
Input types
textarea
Output type
json
Sample coverage
4
API ready
Yes
Overview
Paste a named species list or plain abundance counts to compute richness S, sample-size-corrected Margalef and Menhinick indices, Shannon H′, Pielou evenness J = H′/H′max, and Berger–Parker dominance of the most abundant taxon.
When to use
After quadrat or plot sampling when you need S plus evenness and dominance in one step.
To compare communities of different sample sizes using Margalef d = (S−1)/ln N and Menhinick d = S/√N.
When abundances look skewed and you want Pielou J and Berger–Parker to quantify how uneven the assemblage is.
How it works
1Enter one species per line as name: count (separators : ; = , | or tab) or as plain numbers separated by newlines, commas, or spaces; duplicate names are summed.
2The tool totals individuals N, counts unique species S, and identifies the dominant taxon.
3It reports Margalef d, Menhinick d, Shannon H′, H′max = ln S, Pielou evenness J, and Berger–Parker dominance (proportion of the most abundant species).
Use cases
Summarizing tree or herb counts from forest quadrats into richness, evenness, and dominance.
Classroom or lab exercises that contrast even versus dominated assemblages from the same N.
Rapid comparison of community structure between sites when only a species-abundance list is available.
Examples
1. Even forest quadrat (named counts)
Field ecologist
Background
A 100-stem quadrat recorded five tree species with fairly similar abundances.
Problem
Need S, sample-size-corrected richness, Shannon H′, Pielou J, and which species dominates.
How to use
Paste the named list into Species counts.
Oak: 34
Maple: 28
Beech: 22
Pine: 11
Birch: 5
Outcome
S = 5, N = 100, Margalef d = 0.8686, Menhinick d = 0.5, H′ = 1.4489, H′max = 1.6094, J = 0.9003, Berger–Parker = 0.34 (Oak). Highly even community.
2. Dominated assemblage (plain counts)
Ecology student
Background
Four taxa were tallied as 80, 10, 6 and 4 individuals with no names recorded.
Problem
Determine whether low diversity is due to few species or to one taxon monopolizing the sample.
How to use
Paste the four numbers, one per line (or comma-separated).
FAQ
What input formats are accepted?
Named lines such as Oak: 34 (or with ; = , | or tab) or plain numbers on separate lines or separated by commas or spaces. Duplicate names are merged by summing counts.
What do the Margalef and Menhinick indices measure?
Both correct richness for sample size: Margalef d = (S − 1) / ln N and Menhinick d = S / √N. Higher values mean more species relative to the number of individuals counted.
Can I submit unnamed counts?
Yes. Plain numbers are treated as successive species (Species 1, Species 2, …) so dominance can still be reported.
What is Berger–Parker dominance?
The proportion of all individuals that belong to the single most abundant species. High values (e.g., 0.8) indicate a strongly dominated community.