Elysia Tools Docs
EN
Language
ZHESPTRUFRDEEN
Back to site

Documentation

API & MCP Docs

Developer documentation for every tool — HTTP API reference, multi-language code examples, and MCP integration snippets.

Search tool docs by name, category, or keyword…

Categories

Math, Date & Finance586Images, Audio & Video564Design & Color284Text & Writing203Conversion & Encoding167Developer & Web163Data & Tables151Documents & PDF123

Popular tools

View all

Audio to Text Transcriber (AI)

text

AI Tools

Transcribe speech from audio (wav/mp3/m4a/flac/ogg/webm/aac) to text, SRT, VTT or JSON using the grok-stt AI model. Up to 10 minutes.

audio-to-text-transcriber

NSFW Image Content Detector

json

AI Tools

AI-powered image content safety detector using NSFWJS to classify potentially inappropriate content with fallback analysis, supporting GIF/Animated WebP/APNG and JPEG/PNG/WEBP.

nsfw-image-detector

Rail Fence (ZigZag) Cipher

html

Text Processing

Encode, decode, visualize, and brute-force the Rail Fence transposition cipher. See the zigzag rail grid and try all rail counts to crack a ciphertext.

zigzag-railfence-text

Apgar Score (Newborn 1 & 5 min)

json

Health

Calculate the Apgar score to assess newborn condition at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth. Five signs are each scored 0–2 at both time points: Appearance (skin color), Pulse (heart rate), Grimace (reflex irritability), Activity (muscle tone), and Respiration. Each time point totals 0–10. Interpretation: 7–10 reassuring; 4–6 moderately abnormal (may need assistance); 0–3 critically low (immediate resuscitation). The tool reports both the 1-min and 5-min scores, the change (delta), and per-time-point interpretation. A 5-min score, and especially the change from 1 to 5 min, indicates response to resuscitation; persistent low 5-min scores warrant continued resuscitation and reassessment at 10 min. Derived from Apgar 1953, reaffirmed by ACOG/AAP. The Apgar is a physiologic snapshot at a moment in time and is not, by itself, a marker of asphyxia or long-term neurologic outcome. Not medical advice.

apgar-score

CURB-65 Score (Pneumonia Severity)

json

Health

Calculate the CURB-65 score to assess community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) severity and guide the site of care. Each component scores 1 point: Confusion (new-onset disorientation), Urea > 7 mmol/L (BUN > 20 mg/dL), Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min, Blood pressure (systolic < 90 OR diastolic ≤ 60 mmHg), and Age ≥ 65. Range 0–5. Interpretation: 0–1 low risk (likely outpatient; 30-day mortality ~1.5–2.4%), 2 moderate (consider admission or supervised discharge, ~9.2%), 3–5 high risk (hospital admission; consider ICU for 4–5; mortality rises to ~57% at score 5). Endorsed by the British Thoracic Society. Derived from Lim et al. 2003 (Thorax). Not medical advice.

curb-65-score

CURB-65 vs PSI vs SMART-COP (Pneumonia Severity Comparison)

json

Health

Compare three pneumonia severity scores side-by-side from one set of inputs to support concordance reading. CURB-65 (0-5: Confusion, Urea, RR, BP, age ≥65) — quick bedside triage; PSI/PORT (Fine 1997, 5 risk classes) — the most accurate mortality stratification, more complex; SMART-COP (0-10, 2 points each for SBP <90 and hypoxia, 1 point each for multilobar CXR, albumin <3.5, RR ≥25, tachycardia ≥125, confusion, pH <7.35) — predicts need for ICU respiratory/vasopressor support. Each score has a different focus: CURB-65 is fast; PSI is more precise; SMART-COP identifies who needs ICU. The tool reports each score's total/category/interpretation and an agreement analysis (whether all three point to outpatient/admission/ICU). When scores disagree, favor the more conservative disposition. Derived from Lim 2003, Fine 1997, Charles 2008. Not medical advice.

curb-65-vs-pneumonia-severity

NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

json

Health

Calculate the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to quantify acute stroke neurologic deficit across 11 categories (15 scored items, with left & right limb motor graded separately). Items: 1a Level of consciousness (0–3), 1b LOC questions (0–2), 1c LOC commands (0–2), 2 Best gaze (0–2), 3 Visual fields (0–3), 4 Facial palsy (0–3), 5a/5b Motor arm left/right (0–4 each), 6a/6b Motor leg left/right (0–4 each), 7 Limb ataxia (0–2), 8 Sensory (0–2), 9 Best language (0–3), 10 Dysarthria (0–2), 11 Extinction/inattention (0–2). Both left and right limb motor scores are summed into the total (standard NIHSS); the tool also reports the more-affected side (max of left/right) for clinical context. Range 0–42; higher = more severe. Interpretation: 0 no symptoms, 1–4 minor, 5–15 moderate, 16–20 moderate-to-severe, 21–42 severe. Derived from Brott et al. 1989 (Stroke) and NINDS instructions. Scoring reliability is examiner-dependent and should be performed by trained personnel. Not medical advice.

nihss-score

Ranson Criteria (Acute Pancreatitis, Non-Gallstone)

json

Health

Calculate the Ranson criteria to grade acute pancreatitis severity and estimate mortality (non-gallstone/classic variant). Five criteria at admission (age >55, WBC >16,000, glucose >200, AST >250, LDH >350) and six at 48 hours (hematocrit fall >10%, BUN rise >5 mg/dL, calcium <8, PaO₂ <60, base deficit >4, fluid sequestration >6 L); each = 1 point, total 0–11. Interpretation: 0-2 mild (~2% mortality), 3-4 moderate (~15%), 5-6 severe (~40%), ≥7 very severe (~100%). The gallstone variant uses different thresholds and is NOT included. Derived from Ranson et al. 1974. Not medical advice.

ranson-criteria

Rockall Score (Upper GI Bleeding, Complete)

json

Health

Calculate the COMPLETE (post-endoscopy) Rockall score for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (AUGIB) to predict rebleeding and mortality. Five parameters: Age (<60 =0, 60–79 =1, ≥80 =2); Shock (none SBP≥100 & HR<100 =0, tachycardia SBP≥100 & HR≥100 =1, hypotension SBP<100 =2); Comorbidity (none =0, other major =2, renal/liver failure or disseminated malignancy =3); Endoscopic diagnosis (Mallory-Weiss or no lesion/stigmata =0, all other =1, upper GI malignancy =2); Stigmata of recent hemorrhage (none or dark spot only =0, blood/adherent clot/visible vessel =2). The first three parameters alone form the PRE-ENDOSCOPIC score (0–7); all five form the COMPLETE score (0–11). Interpretation: ≤2 low risk (~4.9% rebleeding, ~0% mortality — consider early discharge); ≥5 high risk. Derived from Rockall et al. 1996 (Gut). The Glasgow-Blatchford Score better identifies very-low-risk patients. Not medical advice.

rockall-score

© 2026 Elysia Tools. Developer documentation.

Back to siteBrowse tools