Is the spec ready to generate artifacts, or still under compatibility review?
Generate types and docs only after the OpenAPI source is the intended candidate; use diff and migration tools first when the main risk is a breaking contract change.
Elysia Tools
Navigation
Workflow Playbook
Generate OpenAPI types and docs, review breaking changes, validate responses, and harden the contract with stress and mutation tests.
Hubs
This workflow is for teams that already have an OpenAPI or Swagger source and need to turn it into useful release evidence. The contract should drive generated TypeScript, documentation, compatibility review, response checks, and defensive tests instead of letting each artifact drift separately.
Start with openapi-to-typescript-generator so frontend, SDK, and integration code can use request and response types that match the candidate spec. Then use api-doc-generator to create documentation from the same source and review whether endpoint descriptions, examples, parameters, and auth notes agree with the generated type surface.
Before publishing, run openapi-diff-breach-detector and api-breaking-changes-detector-migration-planner against the previous release. The useful output is not just a list of changed paths; it should say which consumers are affected, whether a compatibility shim or new version is needed, and what migration note must ship with the release.
Use api-response-contract-validator and api-response-diff-semantic-analyzer on captured payloads to confirm the implementation behaves like the contract says. Finish with api-contract-stress-tester and api-contract-mutation-tester to explore boundary cases and semantically risky inputs. The workflow is complete only when the team can record a release decision with evidence.
Workflow playbook
Start from the approved OpenAPI or Swagger file and generate TypeScript request, response, and model types so SDK and frontend consumers share the same contract vocabulary.
Build human-readable API documentation from the same source, then check that endpoint descriptions, parameters, response examples, and authentication notes match the generated types.
Compare the candidate contract with the previous release, flag breaking changes, and turn high-impact differences into migration or compatibility actions before consumers are surprised.
Validate captured responses against the declared schema, classify semantic payload drift, and run boundary plus mutation cases to prove defensive validation is strong enough for release.
Generate types and docs only after the OpenAPI source is the intended candidate; use diff and migration tools first when the main risk is a breaking contract change.
Use response validation and semantic diffing for observed payloads, then use stress and mutation tests when you need evidence that boundary and risky inputs are rejected correctly.